Bibliography – Topic Modeling in Digital Humanities

Selected DH research and resources bearing on, or utilized by, the WE1S project.
(all) Distant Reading | Cultural Analytics | Sociocultural Approaches | Topic Modeling in DH


Lee, Ashley S., Poom Chiarawongse, Jo Guldi, and Andras Zsom. “The Role of Critical Thinking in Humanities Infrastructure: The Pipeline Concept with a Study of HaToRI (Hansard Topic Relevance Identifier).” Digital Humanities Quarterly 14, no. 3 (2020). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/14/3/000481/000481.html. Cite
Klein, Lauren F. “Dimensions of Scale: Invisible Labor, Editorial Work, and the Future of Quantitative Literary Studies.” PMLA 135, no. 1 (2020): 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2020.135.1.23. Cite
Liu, Alan, Scott Kleinman, Jeremy Douglass, Lindsay Thomas, Ashley Champagne, and Jamal Russell. “Open, Shareable, Reproducible Workflows for the Digital Humanities: The Case of the 4Humanities.Org ‘WhatEvery1Says’ Project.” In Digital Humanities 2017 Conference Abstracts. Montreal: Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations (ADHO), 2017. Cite
Risam, Roopika. “South Asian Digital Humanities: An Overview.” South Asian Review 36, no. 3 (2015): 161–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/02759527.2015.11933040. Cite
Goldstone, Andrew, Susan Galan, C. Laura Lovin, Andrew Mazzaschi, and Lindsey Whitmore. An Interactive Topic Model of Signs. Signs at 40., 2014. http://signsat40.signsjournal.org/topic-model/#/about. Cite
Goldstone, Andrew, and Ted Underwood. “The Quiet Transformations of Literary Studies: What Thirteen Thousand Scholars Could Tell Us.” New Literary History 45, no. 3 (2014): 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2014.0025. Cite
Jockers, Matthew Lee. Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. Topics in the Digital Humanities. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2013. Cite
Tangherlini, Timothy R., and Peter Leonard. “Trawling in the Sea of the Great Unread: Sub-Corpus Topic Modeling and Humanities Research.” Poetics, Topic Models and the Cultural Sciences, 41, no. 6 (2013): 725–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.002. Cite
Schmidt, Benjamin M. “Words Alone: Dismantling Topic Models in the Humanities.” Journal of Digital Humanities, 2013. http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/2-1/words-alone-by-benjamin-m-schmidt/. Cite
Schmidt, Benjamin M. “When You Have a MALLET, Everything Looks like a Nail.” Sapping Attention, 2012. http://sappingattention.blogspot.com/2012/11/when-you-have-mallet-everything-looks.html. Cite
Graham, Shawn, Scott Weingart, and Ian Milligan. “Getting Started with Topic Modeling and MALLET.” Programming Historian, 2012. https://programminghistorian.org/en/lessons/topic-modeling-and-mallet. Cite
tedunderwood. “What Kinds of ‘Topics’ Does Topic Modeling Actually Produce?” The Stone and the Shell, 2012. https://tedunderwood.com/2012/04/01/what-kinds-of-topics-does-topic-modeling-actually-produce/. Cite
Underwood, Ted. Topic Modeling Made Just Simple Enough., 2012. https://tedunderwood.com/2012/04/07/topic-modeling-made-just-simple-enough/. Cite
Underwood, Ted. What Kinds of “Topics” Does Topic Modeling Actually Produce?, 2012. https://tedunderwood.com/2012/04/01/what-kinds-of-topics-does-topic-modeling-actually-produce/. Cite