Bibliography – Humanities as Research Activity

Selected DH research and resources bearing on, or utilized by, the WE1S project.
(all) Distant Reading | Cultural Analytics | Sociocultural Approaches | Topic Modeling in DH


Humanities Indicators. “Funding and Research.” American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2020. https://www.amacad.org/humanities-indicators/funding-and-research. Cite
Abrera, Bella d’. “The Humanities in Crisis: An Audit of Taxpayer-Funded ARC Grants,” 2019. https://apo.org.au/node/268606. Cite
Sapiro, Gisèle, Eric Brun, and Clarisse Fordant. “The Rise of the Social Sciences and Humanities in France: Institutionalization, Professionalization, and Autonomization.” In Shaping Human Science Disciplines: Institutional Developments in Europe and Beyond, edited by Christian Fleck, Matthias Duller, and Victor Karády, 25–68. Socio-Historical Studies of the Social and Human Sciences. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92780-0_2. Cite
Dallal, Ahmad. “The Crisis of the Academic Humanities in the Arab World.” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 37, no. 1 (2017): 134–141. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/657214. Cite
Bulaitis, Zoe. “Measuring Impact in the Humanities: Learning from Accountability and Economics in a Contemporary History of Cultural Value.” Palgrave Communications 3, no. 1 (2017): 7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0002-7. Cite
Heilbron, Johan, Thibaud Boncourt, and Rob Timans. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Understanding the Social Sciences and Humanities in Europe.” Serendipities 2, no. 1 (2017): 1–9. https://serendipities.uni-graz.at/index.php/serendipities/article/view/49. Cite
Smithies, James. The Digital Humanities and the Digital Modern. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. Cite
Ochsner, Michael, Sven Hug, and Ioana Galleron. “The Future of Research Assessment in the Humanities: Bottom-up Assessment Procedures.” Palgrave Communications 3, no. 1 (2017): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.20. Cite
Ochsner, Michael, Sven E. Hug, and Hans-Dieter Daniel. “Humanities Scholars’ Conceptions of Research Quality.” In Research Assessment in the Humanities: Towards Criteria and Procedures, edited by Michael Ochsner, Sven E. Hug, and Hans-Dieter Daniel, 43–69. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_5. Cite
Williams, Geoffrey, and Ioana Galleron. “Bottom Up from the Bottom: A New Outlook on Research Evaluation for the SSH in France.” In Research Assessment in the Humanities: Towards Criteria and Procedures, edited by Michael Ochsner, Sven E. Hug, and Hans-Dieter Daniel, 181–98. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_14. Cite
Krull, Wilhelm, and Antje Tepperwien. “The Four ‘I’s: Quality Indicators for the Humanities.” In Research Assessment in the Humanities: Towards Criteria and Procedures, edited by Michael Ochsner, Sven E. Hug, and Hans-Dieter Daniel, 165–79. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_13. Cite
Mak, Bonnie, and Julia Pollack. “On the Design of the Humanities.” Interactions 23, no. 4 (2016): 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1145/2945291. Cite
Holm, Poul, Arne Jarrick, and Dominic Scott. Humanities World Report 2015. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9781137500267. Cite
Barnett, Tully. “Are the Humanities in Crisis? In Australia, the Sector Is Thriving.” The Conversation, 2015. http://theconversation.com/are-the-humanities-in-crisis-in-australia-the-sector-is-thriving-39873. Cite
Lund, Henrik Stampe. “The Humanities as a Public Good and the Need for Developing Accountability Strategies.” Humanities 4, no. 1 (2015): 98–108. https://doi.org/10.3390/h4010098. Cite
Mittelstrass, Jürgen. “Humanities under Pressure.” Humanities 4, no. 1 (2015): 80–86. https://doi.org/10.3390/h4010080. Cite
Collini, Stefan. “Seeing a Specialist: The Humanities as Academic Disciplines.” Past & Present 229, no. 1 (2015): 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtv029. Cite
Benneworth, Paul. “Tracing How Arts and Humanities Research Translates, Circulates and Consolidates in Society.. How Have Scholars Been Reacting to Diverse Impact and Public Value Agendas?” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 14, no. 1 (2015): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022214533888. Cite
Heilbron, Johan, and Anaïs Bokobza. “Transgresser les frontières en sciences humaines et sociales en France.” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 210, no. 5 (2015): 108. https://doi.org/10.3917/arss.210.0108. Cite
Rudd, Murray A. “Awareness of Humanities, Arts and Social Science (HASS) Research Is Related to Patterns of Citizens’ Community and Cultural Engagement.” Social Sciences 4, no. 2 (2015): 313–38. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci4020313. Cite
Binder, Frank, Bastian Entrup, Ines Schiller, and Henning Lobin. “Uncertain about Uncertainty: Different Ways of Processing Fuzziness in Digital Humanities Data.” In Digital Humanities 2014 Conference Abstracts. Lausanne, 2014. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Uncertain-about-Uncertainty%3A-Different-ways-of-in-Binder-Entrup/22bfeeeced9257bc1e45d23e220e41abfb85146b. Cite
Felt, Ulrike. “Within, Across and Beyond: Reconsidering the Role of Social Sciences and Humanities in Europe.” Science as Culture 23, no. 3 (2014): 384–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2014.926146. Cite
Hazelkorn, Ellen. “Europe Looks for Better Ways to Measure the Value of the Arts and Humanities.” Worldwise, Chronicle of Higher Education, 2013. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Europe-Looks-for-Better-Ways-to-Measure-the-Value-Hazelkorn/75979a2eb074a38d94a05d5aebe73dc8130faf02. Cite
Belfiore, Eleonora, ed. Humanities in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Utility and Markets. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. https://www.palgrave.com/us/book/9780230366657. Cite
Looseley, David. “Speaking of Impact: Languages and the Utility of the Humanities.” In Humanities in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Utility and Markets, edited by Eleonora Belfiore and Anna Upchurch, 91–108. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137361356_6. Cite
Future of Graduate Training in the Humanities Project (SSHRC). “White Paper on the Future of the PhD in the Humanities.” McGill University: Institute for the Public Life of Arts and Ideas, McGill University, 2013. http://tracephd.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/white_paper_on_the_future_of_the_phd_in_the_humanities_dec_2013_0.pdf. Cite
Tonne, Danah, Rainer Stotzka, Thomas Jejkal, Volker Hartmann, Halil Pasic, Andrea Rapp, Philipp Vanscheidt, et al. “A Federated Data Zone for the Arts and Humanities.” In 2012 20th Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing, 198–205, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/PDP.2012.71. Cite
Martyr, Phillipa. “Taken for Granted: Funding Arts and Humanities Research in Australia.” Quadrant 56, no. 10 (2012): 74–80. Cite
Coleman, Daniel, and Smaro Kamboureli, eds. Retooling the Humanities: The Culture of Research in Canadian Universities. 1st ed. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press, 2011. Cite
Lili, Wei. “Funding and Assessment of Humanities and Social Science Research in China--《Management and Review of Social Sciences》2010年03期.” Management and Review of Social Sciences, 2010. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-SHGP201003006.htm. Cite
Pitman, Tim, and Judith E. Berman. “Of What Benefit and to Whom? Linking Australian Humanities Research with Its ‘End Users.’” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 31, no. 4 (2009): 315–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800903191955. Cite
Parker, Jan. “`What Have the Humanities to Offer 21st-Century Europe?’: Reflections of a Note Taker.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 7, no. 1 (2008): 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022207080851. Cite
Davidson, Cathy N. “Humanities 2.0: Promise, Perils, Predictions.” PMLA 123, no. 3 (2008): 707–717. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2008.123.3.707. Cite
Griffin, Gabriele. “Balancing Agendas: Social Sciences and Humanities in Europe.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 5, no. 3 (2006): 229–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022206067619. Cite
Wright, L. S. “Renovating the Humanities for South Africa.” South African Journal of Higher Education 19, no. 3 (2005): 131–46. https://journals.co.za/content/high/19/3/EJC37148. Cite
Krebs, Rebecca, Irini Siouti, Ursula Apitzsch, Silke Wenk, Johann Wolfgang, Goethe Universität, and Und Carl Ossietzky Universität. “Disciplinary Barriers between the Social Sciences and Humanities National Report on Germany,” 2005. Cite
Yang, Rui, and King Hau Au Yeung. “China’s Plan to Promote Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences.” International Higher Education, no. Spring (2002): 20–22. https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/ihe/article/download/6971/6188. Cite
Engell, James, and Anthony Dangerfield. “The Market-Model University: Humanities in the Age of Money.” Harvard Magazine 100, no. 5 (1998): 48–55. https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/14096360. Cite
Hall, Stuart. “The Emergence of Cultural Studies and the Crisis of the Humanities.” October 53 (1990): 11–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/778912. Cite
Finkenstaedt, T. “Measuring Research Performance in the Humanities.” Scientometrics 19, no. 5 (1990): 409–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020703. Cite