Reading with Scientists: Annotate. Advocate.
The version of Frankenstein central to the “Reading with Scientists” syllabus is “Annotated for Scientists, Engineers, and Creators of All Kinds” (MIT […]
The version of Frankenstein central to the “Reading with Scientists” syllabus is “Annotated for Scientists, Engineers, and Creators of All Kinds” (MIT […]
We have reached the heart of Frankenstein. This week in “Reading with Scientists,” we paired Shelley’s novel with selections on the genome-editing […]
How would you characterize the current relationship between literature and science at UCSB? This question kicked off our first day of “Reading […]
To celebrate the first day of “Reading with Scientists: How to Export Literature,” I’d like to share our syllabus (attached below) and […]
Between dense methodological and theoretical work, the wonderful news reaches me that the writer T. A. Barron just donated to UCSB to […]
As I prepare to bring humanities advocacy into the classroom this year, I want to reflect on some initial guiding principles. I […]
The act of interpreting a topic (of a topic model) requires any reader to make sense of a list of words. However, […]
This summer, the Latin America team completed a variety of interesting tasks to create a foundational corpus of Mexico, Central America, and […]
The What Every 1 Says (WE1S) project aims to visualize public discourse on the humanities across many different states, countries, and regions. […]
During our summer research camp, and as part of our “Historical Humanities” team, I began scanning ProQuest databases and the digital collections […]