Bibliography – Topic Model Optimization

Sorted by Tags:
Humanities (all)
Global Humanities | History of Humanities | Humanities Advocacy | Humanities Statistics | Humanities Surveys | Public Humanities | Social Groups and the Humanities | Value of the Humanities | Humanities and Economic Value
Humanities Organizations: Humanities Councils (U.S.) | Government Agencies | Foundations | Scholarly Associations
Humanities in: Asia (Eastern) | Asia (Southern) | Australasia | Europe | Latin America | United Kingdom | United States
Journalism & Media (all)
Lists of News Sources | Databases with News Archives | Journalism Statistics | Journalism Organizations | Non-profit or NGO Journalism Organizations | Media Bias | Press Freedom | Social Media | World & International
Corpus Collection (all)
Corpus Representativeness | Comparison Paradigms for WE1S Corpus: Archives | Canons | Corpus Linguistics | Editions
Data Science & Machine Learning (see also Topic Modeling) (all)
Artificial Intelligence | Big Data | Data Mining | Data Visualization (see also Topic Model Visualizations) | Hierarchical Clustering | Interpretation & Interpretability (see also Topic Model Interpretation) | Mapping | Natural Language Processing | Network Analysis | Sentiment Analysis | Statistical Methods | Text Analysis (see also Topic Modeling)Wikification | Word Embedding & Vector Semantics
Digital Humanities (all) (selected resources related to WE1S methods or issues; some items also included under "Data Science and Machine Learning" and "Topic Modeling")
Cultural & Social Approaches in DH | Distant Reading | Topic Modeling in DH

Narkhede, Sarang. Understanding Confusion Matrix, 2018. https://towardsdatascience.com/understanding-confusion-matrix-a9ad42dcfd62. Cite
Ellis, Peter. Cross-Validation of Topic Modelling, 2017. http://freerangestats.info/blog/2017/01/05/topic-model-cv.html. Cite
Schofield, Alexandra, Laure Thompson, and David Mimno. “Quantifying the Effects of Text Duplication on Semantic Models.” In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2737–47. Copenhagen, Denmark: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D17-1290. Cite
Soltoff, Benjamin. Text Analysis: Topic Modeling, 2016. https://cfss.uchicago.edu/fall2016/text02.html. Cite
Schöch, Christof. Topic Modeling with MALLET: Hyperparameter Optimization, 2016. https://dragonfly.hypotheses.org/1051. Cite
Allahyari, Mehdi, and Krys Kochut. “Discovering Coherent Topics with Entity Topic Models.” In 2016 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI), 26–33. Omaha, NE, USA: IEEE, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/WI.2016.0015. Cite
Murdock, Jaimie, and Colin Allen. “Visualization Techniques for Topic Model Checking.” In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 4284–4285. AAAI’15. Austin, Texas: AAAI Press, 2015. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2888116.2888368. Cite
Chuang, Jason, Margaret E. Roberts, Brandon M. Stewart, Rebecca Weiss, Dustin Tingley, Justin Grimmer, and Jeffrey Heer. “TopicCheck: Interactive Alignment for Assessing Topic Model Stability.” In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 175–184. Denver: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2015. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/N15-1018. Cite
Evans, Michael S. “A Computational Approach to Qualitative Analysis in Large Textual Datasets.” PLOS ONE 9, no. 2 (February 3, 2014): e87908. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087908. Cite
Boyd-Graber, Jordan, David Mimno, and David Newman. “Care and Feeding of Topic Models: Problems, Diagnostics, and Improvements.” Handbook of Mixed Membership Models and Their Applications, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17520-21. Cite
Sievert, Carson, and Kenneth R. Shirley. “LDAvis : A Method for Visualizing and Interpreting Topics.” In Proceedings of the Workshop on Interactive Language Learning, Visualization, and Interfaces, 63–70. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2014. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W14-3110. Cite
Chuang, Jason, Sonal Gupta, Christopher D. Manning, and Jeffrey Heer. “Topic Model Diagnostics: Assessing Domain Relevance via Topical Alignment.” In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 28, III–612–III–620. ICML’13. Atlanta, GA, USA: JMLR.org, 2013. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3042817.3043005. Cite
Chen, Zhiyuan, Arjun Mukherjee, Bing Liu, Meichun Hsu, Malu Castellanos, and Riddhiman Ghosh. “Discovering Coherent Topics Using General Knowledge.” In Proceedings of the 22Nd ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 209–218. CIKM ’13. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1145/2505515.2505519. Cite
Matt Taddy. “On Estimation and Selection for Topic Models.” In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, edited by Neil D. Lawrence and Mark Girolami, 1184–1193. PMLR, 2012. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v22/taddy12.html. Cite
Ponweiser, Martin. “Latent Dirichlet Allocation in R.” Diploma Thesis, Vienna University of Economics and Business, 2012. http://epub.wu.ac.at/3558/. Cite
Chuang, Jason, Daniel Ramage, Christopher Manning, and Jeffrey Heer. “Interpretation and Trust: Designing Model-Driven Visualizations for Text Analysis.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 443–452. CHI ’12. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207738. Cite
Bischof, Jonathan M., and Edoardo M. Airoldi. “Summarizing Topical Content with Word Frequency and Exclusivity.” In Proceedings of the 29th International Coference on International Conference on Machine Learning, 9–16. ICML’12. USA: Omnipress, 2012. https://icml.cc/2012/papers/113.pdf. Cite
Gavagai (company). “The Advantage of Ethersource on the TOEFL Synonym Test Compared to Other Methods.” Gavagai, December 14, 2011. https://www.gavagai.io/blog/2011/12/14/the-advantage-of-ethersource-on-the-toefl-synonym-test-compared-to-other-methods/. Cite
Mimno, David, and David Blei. “Bayesian Checking for Topic Models.” In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 227–237. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011. Cite
Ratinov, Lev, Dan Roth, Doug Downey, and Mike Anderson. “Local and Global Algorithms for Disambiguation to Wikipedia,” 1375–1384, 2011. https://aclweb.org/anthology/papers/P/P11/P11-1138/. Cite
Arun, R., V. Suresh, C. E. Veni Madhavan, and M. N. Narasimha Murthy. “On Finding the Natural Number of Topics with Latent Dirichlet Allocation: Some Observations.” In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, edited by Mohammed J. Zaki, Jeffrey Xu Yu, B. Ravindran, and Vikram Pudi, 391–402. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. Cite
AlSumait, Loulwah, Daniel Barbará, James Gentle, and Carlotta Domeniconi. “Topic Significance Ranking of LDA Generative Models.” In Proceedings of the 2009th European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases - Volume Part I, 67–82. ECMLPKDD’09. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04180-8_22. Cite
Cao, Juan, Tian Xia, Jintao Li, Yongdong Zhang, and Sheng Tang. “A Density-Based Method for Adaptive LDA Model Selection.” Neurocomputing, Advances in Machine Learning and Computational Intelligence, 72, no. 7 (2009): 1775–1781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2008.06.011. Cite
Matveeva, Irina, Gina-anne Levow, Ayman Farahat, and Christiaan Royer. “Terms Representation with Generalized Latent Semantic Analysis.” In Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing IV: Selected Papers from RANLP 2005, 292:45–54. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2007. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.110.2216. Cite
Newman, David, Jey Han Lau, Karl Grieser, and Timothy Baldwin. “Automatic Evaluation of Topic Coherence.” In COLING-ACL 2006: 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics; 17 - 21 July 2006, Sydney, Australia; Proceedings of the Conference. Vol. 1, Vol. 1. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2006. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1858011. Cite
Griffiths, T. L., and M. Steyvers. “Finding Scientific Topics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101, no. Supplement 1 (2004): 5228–5235. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307752101. Cite